Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Bankers’ top exam advice on the ALLL

December 1, 2013
Read Time: 0 min

Banks and credit unions spend months preparing for safety and soundness examinations, and one area that has received regulatory scrutiny in these regulatory reviews is the allowance for loan and lease losses. Even if the bank or credit union hasn’t recently made a significant change in the ALLL, this area is a common one for examiners to review closely.

So what have other banks and credit unions experienced when it comes to examiners’ reviews of the ALLL? What tips do they have for peers? Sageworks earlier this year surveyed banks and credit unions on their recent exam experiences, and financial institutions offered several pieces of advice on the ALLL:

1. Document everything

2. Justify qualitative factors

3. Methodology matters.

Documentation – Many of the FDIC- and OCC-examined institutions in the survey offered advice related to documentation – of a variety of factors related to the ALLL. These included documenting the overall methodology, the formulas, having loan reviewers document well any risk-rating change recommendations and ensuring there are appraisals that can support calculations. 

 “Can’t have enough documentation,” wrote one staffer at an FDIC-examined institution that has  between $75 million and $200 million in assets. “Explaining all decisions will help with the process.”

A respondent with an OCC-examined institution that has between $2 billion and $10 billion in assets said, “Document everything! Every assumption you make, every calculation process, every reason for why you do it the way you do.”

Qualitative factors – Institutions also recommended making sure you can justify qualitative factors used to make adjustments to reserve amounts for FAS 5 loan pools. Several institutions reported that justification for the qualitative factor analysis has continued to be an area of examiners’ focus. 

Methodology – Financial institutions’ actual methodology for the ALLL also apparently drew attention from examiners, because several banks and credit unions had advice on the processes that are established for calculating the ALLL.

“Create a methodology that makes sense and follow it,” said one respondent from a credit union that has between $75 million and $500 million in assets. Many respondents reiterated the importance of keeping up with and following regulatory guidance as closely as possible.

For more advice on the loan loss reserve, download the complimentary e-book, The Complete Guide to the ALLL, or check out live and on-demand webinars related to the ALLL.

About the Author


Raleigh, N.C.-based Sageworks, a leading provider of lending, credit risk, and portfolio risk software that enables banks and credit unions to efficiently grow and improve the borrower experience, was founded in 1998. Using its platform, Sageworks analyzed over 11.5 million loans, aggregated the corresponding loan data, and created the largest

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.