Staffing pressures put AML/CFT and fraud expertise at risk
As I talk with leaders of financial institutions of all sizes, I hear a consistent focus on preparing their teams for what’s ahead. Workload and capacity are familiar pressures, and they’re common challenges for anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) and fraud teams, too. In Abrigo’s recent FinCrime User Group survey, 30% of respondents identified limited staffing or specialized expertise as their team’s biggest challenge, and 20% cited too many alerts, cases, or investigations.
The broader compliance workforce also faces succession pressures. In a separate industry survey of financial institutions, 24% of respondents said up to a quarter of their institution’s compliance staff could become eligible for retirement within five years. Another 9% said more than half could be eligible within five years. AML/CFT and fraud professionals are part of the compliance workforce, so the findings raise a practical question for leaders: When teams already struggle to investigate high-volume, complex financial activity, how can they share critical knowledge and give newer professionals the coaching and practice they need?
