Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

The ALLL today – quantitative challenges

January 3, 2017
Read Time: 0 min

With the 2016 release of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) guidance on the CECL model, banking professionals and consultants have been theorizing about the impact the standard will have on current bank processes. While it is important for these banking professionals to be prepared, consultants are stressing the importance of tackling today’s allowance challenges too. 

One of the challenges impacting financial institutions under current GAAP is how they choose the loss rate methodologies to apply. While data gathering and management are critical steps in the preparation process for CECL, it is important to understand the data and adjust the methodology to maintain accurate loss rates. 

“Choosing and applying the “right” loss rate method is possibly the biggest challenge for most institution’s ALLL today,” said Sageworks Director of Consulting Aaron Lenhart. “Loss rate methods matter, but are mostly driven by charge-offs and the recoveries continue to outpace charge-offs in many situations.”

Common Quantitative Challenges:

  • – Loss rates are driven by charge-offs
  • – Low loss environment good for banking, not as good for ALLL models
  • – Look-back periods can only be stretched so far with the effect of older losses being diluted by longer period averages
  • – Many institutions seeing negative loss rates pushing the recoveries to frequently outpace the charge-offs

Quantitative Solutions:

Options to bolster loss rates include

  • – Extending look-back periods
  • – Period specific weightings – To mitigate risk here, institutions can add pre-emergence period added to calculation for LEP
  • – Loss emergence periods
  • – Introduce loss rate floors

Charge-off based models may understate required reserves during a turn in the business cycle – to a greater extent under CECL.

To learn more about the ALLL challenges today, watch this on-demand webinar: Understanding the ALLL Today before CECL.

About the Author


Raleigh, N.C.-based Sageworks, a leading provider of lending, credit risk, and portfolio risk software that enables banks and credit unions to efficiently grow and improve the borrower experience, was founded in 1998. Using its platform, Sageworks analyzed over 11.5 million loans, aggregated the corresponding loan data, and created the largest

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.