Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Traditional methods for predicting default

Mary Ellen Biery
April 9, 2013
Read Time: 0 min

Exposure to credit risk is widely recognized as the leading source of problems in financial institutions, and much regulatory and industry attention has focused on how credit risk contributed to the financial crisis and how investors, customers and taxpayers can be protected against future losses. Credit risk models like a probability of default or loss-given default are increasingly relied upon to make significant lending and capital-requirement decisions. Four of the most common methods for assessing the probability of default are explained below.

Assessing the probability of default: 4 Common methods

By Mary Ellen Biery, Research Specialist, Sageworks

It’s not surprising that regulators and financial institutions have placed a great deal of emphasis in recent years on the importance of models for credit risk measurement and management. To address this, the largest U.S. banks have historically developed their own models or hired consultants to create a proprietary model. But practices vary widely among smaller institutions, according to Ryan Gaus, director of enterprise solutions at Sageworks. Among the common methods that institutions use for assessing the probability of default are:

Relationship banking

By its nature, the FDIC says, small business lending is often highly customized and labor-intensive, and it’s the kind of lending that community banks are historically set up to do. Perhaps as an outgrowth of a personal-lending approach, some banks provide little in the way of objective measurements of borrowers before a loan application is sent to underwriting. Lenders who have regularly transacted or worked with a business might not perform their own due diligence before passing the full loan application to credit analysts for processing.

“Homegrown” scorecards

One of the most common methods for evaluating the probability of default is a scoring method developed in house by the financial institution. Often a spreadsheet-based, ratio-driven scorecard, this method looks at specific ratios or criteria, like the coverage ratio or loan-to-value ratio, to ensure the metrics meet a minimum threshold that may be unique to the bank.

Community-based scoring

Companies such as Cortera have developed communities of finance professionals that rate and review companies based on their payment histories.

Proprietary, commercial scoring models

Experian and D&B are among the well known companies that rely on reports from creditors about payment histories to develop a credit score for businesses.

To learn more about the pitfalls of traditional methods for predicting default, download the whitepaper titled: Pitfalls of Traditional Methods for Predicting Default.

About the Author

Mary Ellen Biery

Senior Strategist & Content Manager
Mary Ellen Biery is Senior Strategist & Content Manager at Abrigo, where she works with advisors and other experts to develop whitepapers, original research, and other resources that help financial institutions drive growth and manage risk. A former equities reporter for Dow Jones Newswires whose work has been published in

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.