Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

IFSLeaseWorks is now part of Abrigo.

Diversify your portfolio and earn additional interest income. End-to-end lease origination and administration automation make it possible.

Read the press announcement

Looking for TPG Software? You are in the right place!

TPG Software is now part of Abrigo. You can continue to count on the world-class Investment Accounting software and services you’ve come to expect, plus all that Abrigo has to offer.

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy being part of our community.

The silent threat to credit quality: Innovation gaps

Kent Kirby
May 14, 2026
0 min read

The risk of outdated technology and processes

Some financial institutions look efficient on paper but have outdated processes and technology systems. These can reveal gaps in compliance, data integrity, or risk controls. Misclassified borrowers, inconsistent data, and incomplete information lead to flawed decisions.

'Business as usual' no longer works 

My introduction to banking came in a small hometown institution, working summers between college years. Back then, the industry (only half-jokingly) ran on the “3-6-3” rule: pay 3% on deposits, charge 6% on loans, and be on the golf course by 3:00—especially on Thursdays where I worked. 

Those days are gone. Margins are tighter, competition is faster, and borrowers have more options than ever. “Business as usual” no longer works. 

See the benefits of embracing innovation.

Customer success stories

3 Outdated modes of operation

Underwriting

Early in my career, underwriting involved paper, pencils, and a good typewriter ribbon—and it took days. Today, we have automated loan origination systems…and it still takes days.

No amount of technology will fix an obsolete, overly complex underwriting approach. Meanwhile, fintechs offer decisions in minutes and funding within a day. You can debate their philosophy, but your borrowers won’t. They care about speed and certainty. And they will pay for it.

The contrast to lending at many financial institutions is stark: a straightforward credit that could be decisioned in hours instead moves through days of rework, duplication, and handoffs.

Risk isn’t one-size-fits-all, yet we treat it that way. Simple credits should move quickly and consistently. Time and expertise should be reserved for complex risk, where it actually matters.

Approvals

In response to past failures, the industry swung from excessive approval autonomy to excessive control. The result: layered approvals, diffused accountability, and slow decisions.

Recent data shows most institutions still require three or more approval levels for small business credit. That is a process choice with consequences, and in most cases, the process choice isn’t about risk management; it’s risk avoidance.

Not every exposure deserves the same treatment. A small loan that cannot threaten the institution should not be subjected to the same process as a top-tier exposure.

Put this in perspective. Stack rank your loan portfolio by smallest borrower to largest. How much of your portfolio exposure is represented by 50% of your borrowers?  60%? 70%? 80%? I suspect that 70% to 80% of your borrowers combined represent a fraction of your portfolio. Why do you want to spend so much time and effort approving facilities to them when, if you charged off the whole segment (which is highly unlikely given the diversity), you can’t lose your institution?

If you want people to manage risk, give them ownership and make them accountable. Use portfolio tools to identify outliers. Stop treating every loan like your worst-case scenario requiring elevated approvals.

Technology and data

We depreciate software over 3–5 years yet hesitate to invest in modern systems, especially core platforms. Instead, we build workarounds.

The result is a patchwork of spreadsheets—isolated, inconsistent, and poorly governed. Meanwhile, we still insist the core is the “single source of truth,” even when it clearly isn’t.

Worse, we launch products we can’t operationally support. That leads to manual processes, shadow systems, and sometimes even Post-it notes backing what we often market as automated capabilities. Critical data lives outside the system of record and is reconciled manually.

Core replacement is expensive and disruptive. But avoiding it comes with its own cost: inefficiency, errors, and a slow bleed of resources.

Hidden costs = credit costs

There are institutions that look efficient on paper, only to later reveal gaps in compliance, data integrity, or risk controls. Efficiency ratios can mask underlying fragility.

If you don’t trust your data, you can’t manage your portfolio. Misclassified borrowers, inconsistent data, and incomplete information lead to flawed decisions.

If your institution is slow, process-heavy, and reliant on backward-looking metrics because that’s all you have, you have a credit problem, whether you recognize it or not.

The path to closing innovation gaps

In the effort to avoid risk (as opposed to manage it), the result is often an elevated risk profile due to inefficiency, ignorance and error. But there is a way to fix this. This isn’t easy—but it is straightforward.

Principles

Start with a clear foundation:

  • Focus on decision making speed and quality
  • Favor controlled, incremental change over reactive “big bang” efforts
  • Prioritize risk reduction over marginal productivity gains
  • Align credit culture, policy/guidance, and incentives with the desired operating model

Identify blind spots

Bring the right people (line, credit, loan servicing, CRO, CCO, CFO) into a room and dissect the credit process end-to-end. The only “sacred cow” is that there are no sacred cows. If a step exists, it should be defensible. If it isn’t, it should be challenged.

Ask simple but uncomfortable questions:

  • Why does underwriting take so long?
  • What slows approvals?
  • Where are exceptions and overrides coming from? Are they relevant to the true credit risk of the institution, or just pet peeves?
  • How are people actually spending their time?
  • Where are losses—or (more likely) excessive servicing costs—emerging?
  • Do we have the data we need? If not, why?

The goal is clarity: what prevents effective, quick, risk-based decisions?

Fix the operating model

Most efforts fail due to resistance to change rather than due to a lack of insight. Without executive and board-level alignment from the start, modernization will stall.

Focus on:

  • How time is actually spent vs. how it should be spent
  • Streamlining underwriting and eliminating low-value steps
  • Reducing unnecessary approvals
  • Clarifying accountability
  • Aligning incentives with desired behaviors

Once you go through this process and make the necessary adjustments, the next step is to ensure that your policies, guidance, and procedures (as well as the incentive program) are simplified and realigned to the new model and CLEARLY communicated to your team with plenty of time for feedback and internalization.  To simply impose change without communication and alignment is another major flashpoint of failure.

Modernize data (incrementally)

You can’t fix data all at once. But you do need to start somewhere. Pick a handful of critical credit data elements and clean them for your largest exposures. Then expand. Build processes to maintain data quality at every touchpoint, with clear points of accountability and consequences for failure.

In parallel, improve the completeness and timeliness of borrower information, also with accountability and consequences. From there, establish governance to systematically address gaps.

Progress will be incremental, but standing still is not an option.

Use technology thoughtfully

The biggest mistake institutions make when it comes to modernizing systems is layering new technology onto broken processes. Far too often, automation fails because decisions still require excessive time and effort.

Here are some key questions to address as you consider a new loan origination system or other technology:

  • What decisions can be automated?
  • Where is human judgment truly needed?
  • Are roles and responsibilities clear?
  • Is underwriting aligned with actual risk?
  • Are we identifying emerging risks early?

The role of artificial intelligence

AI is a strategy and a tool. Before financial institutions can answer “How do we use AI?” it helps to answer “What problem are we solving?”

Today, on individual credit, AI can already support:

  • Benchmarking and comparative analysis
  • Early detection of financial stress
  • More consistent underwriting decisions

At the loan portfolio level, AI can surface patterns that are very difficult to detect manually—across markets, products, or borrower types.

But AI requires discipline:

  • Clear governance by use case (underwriting, monitoring, portfolio management)
  • Defined human accountability
  • Transparency in outputs
  • Ongoing monitoring for drift and bias

AI can enhance judgment. It cannot replace responsibility.

Rethink how decisions are made

Competing today requires more than adopting new technology. It requires rethinking how decisions are made.

Better decisions—faster, more consistent, and grounded in reliable data—aren’t just an efficiency gain. They are a credit risk imperative. The most dangerous credit risks rarely announce themselves. They build quietly through slow processes, unclear accountability, and unreliable data, until they surface in ways that are harder to correct.

And yes—it’s still okay to play golf on Thursday afternoon.

You might like this webinar: "AI's impact on credit risk: What to consider in your portfolio."

Watch the webinar
About the Author

Kent Kirby

Senior Consultant, Portfolio Risk
Kent Kirby is a retired banker with over 39 years of experience in all aspects of commercial banking: lending, loan review, back-room operations, credit administration, portfolio management and analytics and credit policy.  As Senior Consultant in the Portfolio Risk practice, Kirby assists institutions in the review and enhancement of commercial

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.