3 Outdated modes of operation
Underwriting
Early in my career, underwriting involved paper, pencils, and a good typewriter ribbon—and it took days. Today, we have automated loan origination systems…and it still takes days.
No amount of technology will fix an obsolete, overly complex underwriting approach. Meanwhile, fintechs offer decisions in minutes and funding within a day. You can debate their philosophy, but your borrowers won’t. They care about speed and certainty. And they will pay for it.
The contrast to lending at many financial institutions is stark: a straightforward credit that could be decisioned in hours instead moves through days of rework, duplication, and handoffs.
Risk isn’t one-size-fits-all, yet we treat it that way. Simple credits should move quickly and consistently. Time and expertise should be reserved for complex risk, where it actually matters.
Approvals
In response to past failures, the industry swung from excessive approval autonomy to excessive control. The result: layered approvals, diffused accountability, and slow decisions.
Recent data shows most institutions still require three or more approval levels for small business credit. That is a process choice with consequences, and in most cases, the process choice isn’t about risk management; it’s risk avoidance.
Not every exposure deserves the same treatment. A small loan that cannot threaten the institution should not be subjected to the same process as a top-tier exposure.
Put this in perspective. Stack rank your loan portfolio by smallest borrower to largest. How much of your portfolio exposure is represented by 50% of your borrowers? 60%? 70%? 80%? I suspect that 70% to 80% of your borrowers combined represent a fraction of your portfolio. Why do you want to spend so much time and effort approving facilities to them when, if you charged off the whole segment (which is highly unlikely given the diversity), you can’t lose your institution?
If you want people to manage risk, give them ownership and make them accountable. Use portfolio tools to identify outliers. Stop treating every loan like your worst-case scenario requiring elevated approvals.
Technology and data
We depreciate software over 3–5 years yet hesitate to invest in modern systems, especially core platforms. Instead, we build workarounds.
The result is a patchwork of spreadsheets—isolated, inconsistent, and poorly governed. Meanwhile, we still insist the core is the “single source of truth,” even when it clearly isn’t.
Worse, we launch products we can’t operationally support. That leads to manual processes, shadow systems, and sometimes even Post-it notes backing what we often market as automated capabilities. Critical data lives outside the system of record and is reconciled manually.
Core replacement is expensive and disruptive. But avoiding it comes with its own cost: inefficiency, errors, and a slow bleed of resources.