Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Risk Your Asset/Liability Management Process Might Be Missing

Mary Ellen Biery
November 11, 2019
Read Time: 0 min

Community financial institutions are familiar with utilizing their asset/liability management solutions to limit the risk of rising interest rates. But is your ALM process helping avoid the risk of underperformance when rates fall or remain low? Are you using the ALM to grow earnings and capital?

Obviously, protecting financial institutions against the impact to capital and earnings of rising interest rates has been the particular focus of regulators for more than a decade. Bankers since the financial crisis have become accustomed to seeing language like the following:

“The FDIC is re-emphasizing the importance of prudent interest rate risk oversight and risk management processes to ensure FDIC-supervised institutions are prepared for a period of rising interest rates.”

FDIC FIL-46-2013 October 8, 2013

ALM seen as checking the box

It’s understandable, then, that many financial institutions view the ALM model as a tool for completing a regulatory to-do. In that view, the asset/liability management solution is something to be utilized in order to soothe examiners’ and directors’ concerns about how the financial institution would fare in a worst-case scenario of rising interest rates. The worst-case scenario (as played out in most ALM models) could range from an interest rate increase of anywhere from 100 basis points to 400 basis points. Most analysis focuses on the outcomes of these types of scenarios, and discussion concentrates on how to limit risk tied to rising rates.

However, back when the FDIC sent that 2013 letter mentioned above to financial institutions, the effective federal funds rate was 0.09%. More than seven years later, the fed funds rate is basically unchanged after rising to a high of 2.42% in 2019. 

Ready to use your ALM for strategic decision-making?

Get started

Using ALM to grow in all environments

using ALM to growThe extreme focus of asset/liability management efforts on the risk of rising rates has meant too little focus on how to use ALM to grow earnings and capital in a period when rates have remained low, leading to underperformance at some financial institutions, says Dave Koch, Managing Director of Abrigo Advisory Services.

“A majority of community financial institutions focus on how to limit the risk of rising rates instead of value creation,” he says.

Rather than viewing the ALM process as a regulatory requirement, community financial institutions can use the ALM process as an analytical tool to manage profitability and safety to the satisfaction of stakeholders, management, and regulators – regardless of the interest rate environment.

“A strong ALM process and model should provide financial institutions with answers to critical questions, like what loans, investments, deposits, and borrowings to pursue – and at what rate and terms,” says Koch, who recently led an on-demand webinar series on managing liquidity risk and profitability. “It’s about deciding how I, as a financial institution, get to my financial goals while managing potential risks.”

How to use ALM to grow earnings and capital

However, 70 out of 100 CEOs and CFOs informally surveyed by Abrigo, formerly FARIN, acknowledged they don’t rely on their ALM modeling for decision-making.

One reason ALM models are underutilized is that many bankers don’t trust the results of their ALM models, according to Koch. They recognize that most ALM models lack precision due to a number of factors. Incoming data from the core system might be missing information. For example, a variable loan might be missing the repricing index and margin information because it was set up on the loan system without that data due to human error. Or non-maturity deposit data might be using incorrect assumptions about how long those accounts will remain with the institution because the assumptions are based on industry averages.

Financial institutions certainly have options to correct such issues so they can begin using their ALM process for strategic decision-making. Running a core deposit analysis provides institution-specific, updated information about decay rates for non-maturity deposit accounts, and working with ALM advisory experts can ensure the ALM model has the necessary data and power to generate decision-useful information. For example, institution-specific information on attrition rates of specific non-maturity deposit account products can feed into decisions about what rates to offer customers on those products, rather than relying solely on what rates competitors are offering.

“When it’s done right, ALM provides a community financial institution with the right guidance on maximizing profit while managing risk,” Koch says.

Much like portfolio stress testing, a robust ALM process should allow for the generation of scenarios to provide management a clear view of the financial institution's risk profile under a variety of conditions, said Neekis Hammond, Managing Director of Abrigo Advisory Services. Financial institutions that utilize the same portfolio data for the ALM as for other risk activities, such as calculating the allowance for credit losses, will be able to provide these scenarios with more confidence than institutions using various systems and inputs.

"When executed thoughtfully, CECL [current expected credit loss] models may be leveraged to produce a variety of detailed information about interest timing, credit adjusted rates of return, and lost interest due to defaults," Hammond said.

Financial institutions that maximize profit while managing risk will be able to not only avoid the hazards of extreme increases in interest rates, they will also be able to elude the danger of underperformance and failing to create value during more routine interest rate periods.

About the Author

Mary Ellen Biery

Senior Strategist & Content Manager
Mary Ellen Biery is Senior Strategist & Content Manager at Abrigo, where she works with advisors and other experts to develop whitepapers, original research, and other resources that help financial institutions drive growth and manage risk. A former equities reporter for Dow Jones Newswires whose work has been published in

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.