Recent headlines may lead bankers to believe that shunning commercial real estate lending is the safest path to limit or avoid credit risk, given stresses on CRE and regulatory concerns. But that might not be the best move for your financial institution or your community.
Abrigo advisors Kent Kirby and Senior Consultant Rob Newberry argue that even in this complex environment, banks and credit unions should explore opportunities by considering the unique dynamics of their portfolios and local markets while carefully assessing risks. They explained adopting a more nuanced approach during a recent Abrigo webinar for bankers.
Traditional bank CRE financing 'scarce'
Banks and credit unions are critical sources of capital for businesses in the financial institutions’ communities, so automatically following the prevailing “conventional wisdom” related to CRE can hurt members or customers, Kirby said. It could also provide unnecessary opportunities for competitors to get the business relationships.
Indeed, traditional bank CRE financing in September 2023 was labeled “scarce” by the Federal Advisory Council, which expected continued slowing in lending this year. Banks and thrifts hold half of all outstanding CRE debt through the second quarter, with insurance companies accounting for 12% and commercial mortgage-backed securities holding 14%, according to Trepp.
Bankers should examine warning signs and shore up defenses for existing income-producing CRE loans as part of commercial property loan risk management. But understanding trends in their own portfolios and local markets can allow lenders to identify risk-appropriate CRE credits.
“Today, particularly in commercial real estate, conventional wisdom is causing a lot of people to overreact,” said Kirby, Director of Advisory Services. “Don’t believe everything you read or hear about CRE.”